.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

No Pepper Games - A Fantasy Baseball Blog

Friday, April 07, 2006

Fantasy Baseball 101: 5x5? 6x6? Someone please pass me the Clue-by-4

I've noticed that I get quite a few hits from folks who are Googling for "6x6 categories" or somesuch. While I do quietly point and laugh, I realize I was in the same boat just a few years ago. For those very new to fantasy baseball (or who feel they've mastered the simple complexity of the 5x5 format and want to know more), I offer the following short introduction to what the friggin' deal is.

First off, 99.9% of what I write about here has to do with the Rotiserrie format of fantasy baseball. I do not condone playing Head-to-Head (which many fantasy football converts want to initially play because they're familiar with it - to this I say, you'll not like it, and you'll hate baseball the rest of your life. If that happens, then what? Do you want to be miserable for 4 months until football starts back up? No, no you don't. So just take my word on it.). H2H is broken, it's horrible, it's a mess. To give the football folks an analogy, how would you respond to a format of fantasy football where you could consistently win without drafting (or even playing) running backs? Yup, that's the case here. (If you want a rundown on Rotiserrie (or "Roto"), check out the Wiki article.)

5x5 Format
Okay, let's get to it. Basic Roto ball revolves around 10 categories - 5 for hitters, 5 for pitchers. They are:

  • Runs
  • Homeruns
  • Runs Batted In (RBIs)
  • Stolen Bases
  • Batting Average

  • Wins
  • Saves
  • Strikeouts
  • Earned Run Average
  • WHIP (Walks + Hits)/Innings Pitched
This is standard, but it is not set in stone. You may find a league where they've decided that the RBI is overrated, and replace it with something (say, On Base Percentage). That's fine - but don't just refer to it as "a 5x5 league" - it's "a 5x5 league with OBP instead of RBIs" so people know what the hell you're talking about. Personally, I like to replace Batting Average with On Base Percentage - it takes walks into account, which is just as good as a hit, right? Slugging not so much, as it then double counts HRs, and still doesn't count walks.


6x6 Format
There is no standard 6x6 format. Roto ball is 5x5, with maybe a little gravy on top. Some people like beef gravy, some chicken gravy. Some strange people in the south like "cream gravy" - that's why they lost the war. But I digress...

It depends on the league to determine what extra categories they want to add. There is only one firm rule you should abide by - if you add a hitting category, you should add a pitching category. Balance it out a little bit. To go a bit further, some want to insist that you should keep the same "type" of stat as your added category. If you're adding On Base Percentage to hitting, add another percentage or ratio to pitching, like K/9 or K/BB. I don't think you have to - look at the original 5x5 format, pitching has 2 ratios while hitting only has 1.

These are a few categories that I favor:

Hitting:
On Base Percentage
Strikeouts (a negative counting stat)
Slugging (but only paired with OBP instead of AVG)
Doubles (maybe)

Pitching:
K/9
K/BB
Batting Average Against (unfortunately, Yahoo does not have this as a category)
Holds
Losses

Again, 6x6 is your creation. Just don't try to throw something in there for the hell of it - think about what you're doing before you do it. You may think, "gosh, Complete Games and Shutouts are perfect reflections of a dominant pitcher!" and forget that it's not. At all. They're perfect indications of (a) a rubber arm, (b) that Dusty Baker is your manager, (c) you're pretty darn good, (d) you're pretty darn lucky, or (e) the opposing team sucks complete ass. Usually, it's (e), with a fair bit of (b) thrown in there.

Confidential to Dusty in Chicago: You suck.

12 Comments:

  • Is it just me or shouldn't Holds+Saves be a category, at least an option?

    Also, do you have an opinion of using Quality Starts as opposed to Wins?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:35 PM, April 10, 2006  

  • Yes to both. Holds+Saves is basically the exact same thing - the definition of a Hold is a save, but not for the final out. There's no statistical difference between what Scot Shields does and what Derrick Turnbow do - so why not combine them?

    Quality Starts also makes a lot of sense - Wins is a bullshit category. Cy Youngs have been misplaced for the last several years because of writers' inability to look past the statistic. They're the writers! They should know these things!

    By Blogger NoPepperGames, at 11:44 PM, April 10, 2006  

  • I asked this over on the fanhome fantasy baseball board, but I will repeat here.

    Too many people I know only want to do H2H so they can beat some one in a given week. So what tweaks would you give to H2H in order to give it stats that are more meaningful in terms of wins, as well as replicating what kinds of players real GMs value?

    R,RBI,OB,SLG, SB-CS?
    QS,H+Sv,K,ERA,WHIP?
    Min innings in the 25-35 range?

    Would you need a 6th Cat in each?

    And, though it isn't possible on any fantasy site that I know, what do you think about defense being a team category? As in drafting a team's defense? I'm thinking something like Defensive Efficiency Rating. Since most sabermetric minds seem to say that defense is somewhere between 2 and 7% of the game if DER were one of 13 total categories that would be about right.

    Are there 6th offensive and pitching cats that you would find the most likely to add to the five listed above?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:55 PM, April 11, 2006  

  • This is where I leave my fantasy "expert" credentials. I don't even want to try to answer this question - it means trying to legitimize H2H as a format. Sorry, I'm just not going to do that. Call me a "H2Hist" if you like! (Seriously, sorry.)

    By Blogger NoPepperGames, at 11:23 PM, April 11, 2006  

  • But I will say that having a team defense isn't a good idea - there's too much variation. It makes firstbasemen that much more valuable for the UT slot - when you should be trying to find something that makes middle infielders a bit more valuable with a 6th category. That's ultimately the point of adding extra categories - creating a larger amount of parity at the middle/end of a draft (i.e. the slap hitters, on-base specialists who normally aren't valued as highly in fantasy, but provide a lot of value to a true MLB team).

    By Blogger NoPepperGames, at 11:29 PM, April 11, 2006  

  • I meant with team defense, that you would draft a team, like happens in many football leagues. Not give a player credit for any defensive performance.

    And I am really starting to understand the anti-H2H.

    I'm trying to fix the obviously broken system

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:14 AM, April 12, 2006  

  • Oh, that would make more sense. I'm not sure if it's an option anywhere, though, and I'm not sure how fun it'd be - there wouldn't be a lot of strategy, like there is with team defense in football. It couldn't hurt to try.

    By Blogger NoPepperGames, at 9:44 AM, April 12, 2006  

  • But what about when a pitcher gets a win and it ISN'T a quality start? Would it be better to do Quality Starts + Wins? Or would this just go to far?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:23 AM, April 18, 2006  

  • I think too far. QS and Wins measure different things. Wins measures a pitcher's offense, luck and part of his skill. QS measures his skill. It's those damned BBWAA folk that have everyone drooling over the irrelevant Win.

    By Blogger NoPepperGames, at 11:46 AM, April 18, 2006  

  • while i can accept the consequences this brings for the starting pitcher who gets more wins than he should, I cannot, however, accept that this would curtail totally sweet relief wins, which I think are one of the more essential aspects of fantasy

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:48 PM, April 18, 2006  

  • Relief wins are, as you say, totally sweet. I can't argue with that. But if you discount the wins vultured by blown saves, their method of procurement are bullshit (for the most part - Scot Shields et al. are the exception).

    To combat that, I'd just add holds. It gives MR some more value, and SPs retain their value from having QS being solely in their domain.

    By Blogger NoPepperGames, at 4:16 PM, April 18, 2006  

  • it would probably be the best way to go about it, but i just don't think i could adjust to it..

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:29 PM, April 18, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home